Skip to content
Attend the AI Skills Tech & Talent Summit at The Plaza, New York City. Express interest
The 2024 Developer Skills Report is here! Read now
Discover the universities with top developer talent. Based on 860,000 student technical assessments. Download Now

HackerRank’s Approach to Responsible AI

"Bias-free, data safe, human-first. HackerRank AI."

As HackerRank embraces AI in the products and solutions we build, we're focused on doing so responsibly and in a human-first way. We have identified 4 key pillars for building our AI systems with a responsible, customer-focused approach.

Bias Detection & Mitigation

We employ industry-standard bias detection and mitigation practices, adhering to the latest bias audit requirements to ensure we and our customers comply with bias mitigation requirements under applicable laws. Our commitment to fairness drives us to ensure that no AI system or model we use has measurable bias. Here’s how we address specific areas of bias:

Data Collection and Preparation

  • Where possible and permitted we start by ensuring that our datasets represent diverse populations. This involves collecting data from various demographic groups and ensuring that minority groups, if relevant, are adequately represented.
  • We anonymize and normalize the data processed by our AI systems to remove any identifiers that could introduce bias. This helps create a level playing field for all candidates.

Bias Detection

  • We implement statistical tests and algorithms to detect biases in our data and models. Techniques such as disparate impact analysis, bias amplification testing, and fairness-aware machine learning algorithms are used to identify any discrepancies in how different groups are treated.
  • Where required to ensure we and our customers comply with laws related to the use of AI systems for automated employment decisions, we conduct or assist our customers in conducting, regular bias audits of our AI systems. These audits involve assessing the model’s performance across different demographic groups and identifying any unfair treatment.

Bias Mitigation

  • To mitigate bias, we use techniques such as re-weighting, re-sampling, and data augmentation. These methods help in balancing the data and reducing any inherent biases.
  • We also employ fairness constraints in our machine learning models to ensure that the outcomes are equitable for all groups. This includes modifying the objective functions of our algorithms to prioritize fairness alongside accuracy.

Model Evaluation and Testing

  • Our models undergo rigorous testing in diverse settings to ensure that they produce fair outcomes across all demographic groups. This includes cross-validation techniques and scenario analysis to assess model behavior in different contexts.
  • We involve diverse teams in the model evaluation process to bring various perspectives and identify potential biases that might be overlooked.

Ongoing Monitoring and Improvement

  • Bias mitigation is an ongoing process. We continuously monitor our models for signs of bias and update them based on new data and feedback. This iterative process helps in maintaining fairness as a model evolves.
  • We also engage with external experts and stakeholders to review our practices and incorporate the latest research and best practices in bias detection and mitigation.

By employing these robust bias detection and mitigation practices, HackerRank ensures that our AI systems are fair, transparent, and equitable, reinforcing our commitment to unbiased hiring processes.

Data Privacy & Security

When building AI systems, we have a strong focus on ensuring customer and candidate data is held to a high standard and that data privacy is respected. We do this with the following key practices:

Data Anonymization

We remove personal information or personal data (as defined by applicable law), such as names, email addresses, and company information from datasets before training any of our AI systems. This ensures that training data cannot be linked back to individual candidates or users of our platform. This also helps reduce bias by ensuring that data used to train any solution used to assist in decision-making is not unfairly targeting a candidate’s previous performance and that candidate data is not cross-pollinated between company assessments.

Secure Data Handling

Our systems use standard security protocols when transmitting any data such as SSL/TLS. We also conduct regular security audits on our infrastructure to ensure nothing falls out of compliance.

Third-Party AI Systems

We undergo a strict vetting process for third-party AI systems that are used as part of our platform, to ensure they adhere to data privacy compliance standards. To date, you can see who our current third-party providers are within our AI Feature Terms.

Compliance and Regulation

HackerRank adheres to all relevant data protection laws and regulations, such as GDPR, CCPA, and other regional privacy laws.

User Control and Transparency

We empower users with control over their data, providing options to access, correct, or delete their information. We offer clear and transparent information about our data practices to ensure users are fully informed.

Platform Security & Reliability

We take a proactive approach to security, focusing on safeguarding both data and systems. This involves conducting regular vulnerability assessments, embedding security best practices in AI development, and establishing a comprehensive incident response strategy. We are focused on achieving a high level of reliability in our AI systems through continuous performance monitoring, stringent quality assurance, and critical failsafe mechanisms.

Security Measures

  • Regular Vulnerability Assessments: We conduct vulnerability assessments and penetration testing to identify and address potential security risks. These assessments help in detecting vulnerabilities in our systems before they can be exploited.
  • Security Best Practices: Security is embedded at every stage of AI development. This includes secure coding practices, regular code reviews, and the use of standard protocols such as SSL/TLS to protect data integrity and confidentiality.
  • Incident Response: Our incident response strategy swiftly addresses security breaches or threats with a focus on auditability. We document all actions, including the detection of threats using advanced monitoring tools, assessment of severity to prioritize response efforts, containment of impact to prevent further damage, resolution of issues to restore normal operations, and review of incidents to identify improvements.

Reliability and Performance

  • Rigorous Model Testing: The models behind any AI system used in decision-making flows are rigorously tested. We target specific online and offline performance metrics as needed per model, ensuring they meet high standards for accuracy, fairness, and reliability.
  • Continuous Performance Monitoring: We implement continuous monitoring of our AI systems to track performance and identify any anomalies. This helps in maintaining system reliability and ensuring consistent performance.

Third-Party AI Tools

  • Thorough Vetting Process: Any third-party AI tool or framework is thoroughly vetted before being integrated into our platform. This involves platform testing with providers like OpenAI and ensuring their terms and conditions align with our security and terms of service for customers.
  • Compliance and Standards: We ensure that third-party tools comply with applicable laws and adhere to data privacy and security safeguards.  We regularly review these tools to ensure continued compliance.

Internal AI Gateway

  • Ensuring Continuous Uptime: Our internally developed AI Gateway is focused on ensuring continuous uptime. This gateway acts as a centralized system for managing AI models, providing high availability, scalability, and reliability.
  • Failsafe Mechanisms: Critical failsafe mechanisms are in place to handle system failures gracefully. This includes automated failover processes, redundancy, and backup systems to ensure uninterrupted service. This means that we are routing a request to any number of internal models or service providers as needed.

Interpretability & Consistency

When possible, we will select models that allow for interpretable results. As an example, we may choose a simpler algorithm in place of a more complex algorithm despite better performance from the more complex algorithm. We do this to ensure that we can explain clearly which signals and which data points have the greatest impact on the prediction, decision, or generative output of the model. This is primarily relevant to the decision-making capabilities we are building such as our AI-powered plagiarism detection.

One area where this isn’t feasible yet is with generative AI models (GenAI). With GenAI models, we will lean towards measuring and guaranteeing the consistency of the outputs of the models. We do this by rigorously testing the outputs of the models through internal evaluation datasets and validation exercises. This is a rapidly developing area, and we are keeping pace with advancements in model interpretability to ensure we can quickly adopt any advancements that can help us provide our customers clarity on outputs from GenAI models.